Hey there,
I have a couple of suggestions for a couple of articles I'd like to see.
The first is one by the judges of these carving contests. I'd really like to know what they look for and why? What makes one carving stand out over another? Perhaps some tips on how to do better in competitions. I know that I have disagreed with some of the choices they have made, but to be fair, we should hear their side of things.
The next article is what defines a carver at a particular level. In competitions there are often catagories based on experience. If a carver has been working for years but not competing, is he a novice, intermediate or advanced? How does one advance in these things? What are the formal definitions?
Thanks,
Dan
I have a couple of suggestions for a couple of articles I'd like to see.
The first is one by the judges of these carving contests. I'd really like to know what they look for and why? What makes one carving stand out over another? Perhaps some tips on how to do better in competitions. I know that I have disagreed with some of the choices they have made, but to be fair, we should hear their side of things.
The next article is what defines a carver at a particular level. In competitions there are often catagories based on experience. If a carver has been working for years but not competing, is he a novice, intermediate or advanced? How does one advance in these things? What are the formal definitions?
Thanks,
Dan
Comment